Thursday, November 21, 2013

Issues in Evidence

To: Managing Partner From: Ronelia - 30649947 (Summer Clerk) Date: 25 September 2007 Re: Issues relating to evidential issues from Tims drug charge. 1.Introduction Tim is charged for selling and supplying drugs. In a telephone message to our firm he admits to lay crops. He has a criminal record for planting marijuana crops quatern times in the past 10 years. in that respect is material show available to the prosecution which places him at the scene of the crime. He has made a command to the law. He was seen running away(p) from the location, in his statement he said to the Police that he had cultivated the drugs found in his hosue for recreational use. several(prenominal) issues ascend regarding the relevance and admissibility of this evidence, as well as the competence and compellability of witnesses. The prevalent rule is that if evidence is relevant it is admissible and that in all witnesses atomic number 18 competent and compellable. These rules are sphere to exclusionary rules. This matter will be heard under the air jacket Australian Evidence passage 1906 (the Act). 2.Executive Summary The prosecution has unanimous evidence to link Tim to the incident. There are stock-still, several issues that overturn regarding the inadmissibility of some of the evidence. This is due to the spare-time activity main issues: The first of hearsay.
bestessaycheap.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!
The statement made by the bit on the corner would be considered hearsay. Secondly the prosecution may have obtained some of the evidence without a warrant to acquiesce his house or in a nonher illegal trend; it will therefore be wit hin the judges discretion whether this evide! nce is inadmissible. Thirdly, credit evidence is often punic due to personal opinion, however the statements regarding the identity of Tim will he relevant and admissible barely will carry a low probative weight. lastly the admissibility of the statement made by Tim is open to challenge. Tims entrance money on the message he left will not be admissible in court due to lawyer client privilege....If you want to pop off a wide-eyed essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.