Maritiime Port And Security Act 2002 Critique

MARITIME TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ACT OF 2002 : A CRITIQUE2006TABLE OF CONTENTS1 .A skeleton Legislative History of the notification 32 . study of foregoing Legislation : The Need for MTSA 4Summary of Pertinent Provisions of the MTSA 7Strengths and Weaknesses of MTSA 10Final opinion and Recommendations to gird MTSA 15REFERENCES 171 .A Brief Legislative History of the vertexThe united States (US , who is a fellowship to the supranational Maritime Organization (IMO , has colossal been pushing for a solution to the issue of maritime guarantor worldwide . Prompted by the US , the IMO hold to make certification amendments to the Safety of lifespan at Sea group meeting 1974 (SOLAS . Parties to the IMO and SOLAS form terminalized these amendments at a diplomatic held at the IMO in declination 2002 in capital of the Unit ed Kingdom In the diplomatic conference , it was agreed upon that maritime certificate measures will be accepted internation bothy by January 1 , 2004 , and in force six months by and by by July 1 , 2004 worldwide . As a case of this agreement , the International Ship and Port Facility ordinance (ISPS ) was drafted containing the amendments and complimentary aliment to the SOLAS . The ISPS was included as an Annex to Chapter XI-2 of the SOLAS Convention . The new shelter code is the startle multilateral transmit and way shelter standard ever created . It requires nations to develop fashion and institutionalize aegis plans primarily as a precaution against the threat of terrorist attacks . It excessively provides for a standard framework in helping g everywherenments to prize risks in case of threat to ship and port facilities . The ISPS applies to totally passenger ships on foreign voyages , to all other ships over 500 G on international voyages , and all p ort facilities serving ships on internationa! l voyages (Peppinck , 2003 US Department of country of origin security measures , 2003The Maritime Transportation Security human action of 2002 (MTSA ) is considered as the US equivalent of the ISPS .

It is the US response to the security amendments take by the SOLAS and its complementary ISPS The purpose of the Bill is to strengthen and kick in additional defense to the United States (US ) port security . The Bill was designed primarily to protect the US ports and waterways from terrorist attacks . MTSA was signed on November 25 , 2002 . In July 1 , 2003 , the transitory interim rules for the Act was publ ished , as well as the issuanceive employment of regulations . In the same month , a public meeting was held in Washington , D .C , and the MTSA was put down . On October 22 , 2003 , the publication of the final rules on MTSA was released , and the final rules took effect 30 days after publication on November 22 , 2003 . The Act was finally fully implemented on July 1 , 2004 (US Department of Homeland Security , 2003 United States seacoast Guards , 20062 .Review of antecedent Legislation : The Need for MTSAMTSA was enacted pursuant to the ISPS reckon , which is considered as the first multilateral ship and port security standard created . Since MTSA complies with the standards and requirements of...If you wish to get a full essay, aver it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay