Archetypal - Analysis Essay

Known as the come apart of analytic psychology, Carl Jung revolutionized the way the humanness beargond at the human head teacher through the creation of the archetype, the joint unconscious, and the mortalality (introverted and extroverted) (Wikipedia.org). Jung created whatsoever of the best known psychological concepts much(prenominal) the archetypes of the conscious and unconscious mind. Jim Thompsons The killer deep down Me (1952) and Chester Himes A Rage in Harlem (1989) are two flora of literature that explore these archetypes. In order to thrive in society, as presented in Thompsons and Himes novels, characters (such as Lou and Imabelle) are strained to adapt and change in order to achieve their goals. Thus, I argue that prototypal possibility is a useful beak to analyze the evolution of both Lou and Jacksons drumhead in The Killer inside Me (1952) and A Rage in Harlem (1989).In particular I look at the ego, persona, and shadow in Thompsons and Himes novels.\nFir stly, in archetypal theory, the ego looks at how characters tenderness themselves, what they find important (or unimportant), and whether or not they share these thoughts with others. As C.G Jung mentions, the ego is a intersection of the consciousness (1973:7). This suggests that the above decisions are made consciously and not, perhaps, as the result of passive socialisation due to external influences such as religion or the mass media. It is important to ancestry that the ego interacts closely with its counterparts the id (ones desires and impulsive needs) and super-ego (ones intercourse to reality) by acting as a mediator amid the two. Thus, the ego is created from a agree between a persons individual desires and the preponderant social norms of society (or a specific environment).\nAs depicted in Thompsons The Killer Inside Me (1952), individuals in capitalistic societies (such as Lou) demonstrate how the ids desires can be set up without fear of repercussion...